[The following is excerpted and modified ever so slightly from my Introduction to the Catalog of artwork submitted for the Museum of Computer Art's annual 2014 Donnie contest.]
While looking at Dreilich’s photo of an athletic field with a set of empty bleachers in the background my eye drifted off to the right and caught a glimpse of someone in a robe carrying a cross out of frame.
How odd, I thought. Beyond the obvious narrative, what else am I seeing here?
With that question we find ourselves standing right at the point where reality and art part company, between the apparent and the assumed, between the perceptible and the imperceptible.
Several years ago I discovered Impressionism, French Impressionism, and the works of Edouard Manet, Edgar Degas and Berthe Morisot in particular. After looking at dozens of their paintings it suddenly struck me that each artist sought to express their own peculiar vision of the world around them in a unique way: not through attempting representation of reality, rather by trying to capture how that reality “impressed” their sensibilities. And each one did it quite differently from the others. Quite.
So it is with computer art.
Of course, to say that each artist sees a thing with a peculiarly distinct, personal vision is to state the obvious. Each artist then attempts to express that very special vision in a way uniquely his own, like the Impressionists, with a vision at once personal and public, impregnable yet vulnerable.
For it is right here that the viewer comes into the picture (pun intended). For it is the viewer, the observer, the reader of minds who must discern what the artist’s vision may be and fit that comprehension into the context of whether the viewer cares for the vision or the presentation.
We reflect on the canvas (or monitor screen) and wonder "what is it I’m seeing?" While some visions cannot be comprehended at all, others are patently obvious. Or so it may seem, but things are rarely ever as they seem.
I like much of the work found at the Museum of Computer Art: some pieces speak directly to my sensitivities; others leave me perplexed as to what the point is (or may be). But that is art. Art is at once personal and public; personal in its individual appeal and yet public in the general exposure, at once unassailable because it comes from within the artist and yet vulnerable in the extreme since the artist seeks to share it with total strangers.
Which artists draw you into their vision, and which leave you cold, unmoved, unengaged? Most importantly, why you feel such passion or ambivalence, indifference or animosity? Why do you prefer a certain vision, a distinct expression and not another?
Art is give and take, see and understand, accept or reject. Art is a dialogue. Join it.
[so, check out the MOCA site, browse for a bit, sink your mind's eye into some of the most luscious art to come out of another human's being. . . ]
Who is Irma Brunner?
My personal conversation with art
Thursday, February 5, 2015
Sunday, October 19, 2014
Aspects of human nature by Giovanni Boldini
Sunday, October 12, 2014
Women you may know by Giovanni Boldini
a portrait of Emiliana Concha de Ossa
|
Emiliana Concha de Ossa 1901
|
Cleo de Merode |
Consuelo duchess of Marlborough with her son Ivor Spencer Churchill 1906
|
Countess de Rasty seated in an armchair
|
Diaz Albertini 1909 |
girl in a black hat 1890
|
lady in rose |
madame Georges Hugo and her son Jean 1898
|
madame Michelham 1913
|
madame Pages in evening dress 1912
|
mademoiselle de Nemidoff
|
mademoiselle l’Anthelme 1907
|
miss Bell 1903 |
mademoiselle Laure 1910 |
mrs Leeds the later princess Anastasia of Greece and Denmark 1914
|
portrait of a lady, Lina Bilitis with two Pekinese 1913
|
Alice Regnault 1880 |
Elizabeth Wharton Drexel 1905
|
Gladys Deacon 1908 |
Lina Cavalieri 1901 |
Lina Cavalieri 1901 |
madame Doyen 1910 |
madame Josephina Alvear de Errazuriz 1892
|
madame Julliard in red 1912 |
mademoiselle de Gillespie, la dame de Biarritz 1912
|
mrs. Howard Johnston 1906 |
princess Marthe Lucile Bibesco 1911
|
Rita de Acosta Lydig 1911
|
Sarah Bernhardt |
countess Zichy 1905 |
countess Ritzer |
Monday, October 6, 2014
The Sterling and Francine Clark Art Institute, Williamstown, Massachusetts
In 2011 we visited this incredible little gem of a museum located in the wilds of the far northwestern corner of Massachusetts, a space that seems almost dedicated to those who seek out the French Impressionists. At that time the the museum was in the process of expanding into a new space and most of the French Impressionist work was loaned out. Well, the good news is Renoir, Degas, Manet, Morisot and their comrades are back from their tour -- and the new building and environment is not to be missed.
It gets better: here you can also find an incredible collection of Winslow Homer juxtaposed neatly with several moving pieces by Frederick Remington. Plus there are a few other treasures to be found and savored; Giovanni Boldini being one of our discoveries this trip. His work is small in scale but huge in effect. And of course there's the Alfred Stevens room and the numerous works by Corot, Daubigny, and Sargent, three more "favorites" of ours.
By the time we arrived at it was getting later in the lunch hour and so our first order of business was to grab something to eat. We were pleasantly surprised to find the food at the Clark Cafe quite tasty.
Without a doubt this is one of the finest art museums on the East Coast. It's
not easy to get to but then nothing worthwhile is ever easy, right?
It gets better: here you can also find an incredible collection of Winslow Homer juxtaposed neatly with several moving pieces by Frederick Remington. Plus there are a few other treasures to be found and savored; Giovanni Boldini being one of our discoveries this trip. His work is small in scale but huge in effect. And of course there's the Alfred Stevens room and the numerous works by Corot, Daubigny, and Sargent, three more "favorites" of ours.
Undertow 1886 by Winslow Homer |
child with bird (Mademoiselle Fleury in Algerian costume) 1882 by Renoir |
Venice, the Doge's Palace 1881 by Renoir |
Portrait of a young woman 1874 by Renoir |
Woman crocheting 1875 by Renoir |
a box at the theatre (concert) 1880 by Renoir |
Marie Therese Durand-Ruel sewing 1882 by Renoir |
the bath 1885-86 by Berthe Morisot |
the cliffs of Etretat 1885 by Claude Monet |
Comte Henri Amedee Mercure Turenne d'Aynac 1816 by Jacques Louis David |
Trumpeter of the Hussars 1815-20 by Théodore Géricault |
featured exhibition: Magna Carta |
Dance of the masked dancers 1879 by Degas |
Mery Laurent wearing a small toque 1882 by Edouard Manet |
Jane Avril 1891-92 by Henri Toulouse-Lautrec |
dancers in the classroom c. 1880 by Degas |
the dancer by Degas |
young woman crocheting 1875 by Giovanni Boldini |
young woman reading 1875 by Lucio Rossi |
By the time we arrived at it was getting later in the lunch hour and so our first order of business was to grab something to eat. We were pleasantly surprised to find the food at the Clark Cafe quite tasty.
the back side of the cafe |
turkey wrap |
flatbread with roast beef |
looking out toward the reflecting pool |
the reflecting pool |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)